Comparison

Ontevo vs. Triple Whale

Triple Whale tracks which ad drove the sale. Ontevo diagnoses why the product is not converting in the first place, and prices each gap in dollars.

Free Rapid Scan. Your website and your email. Nothing to connect.

Scan running. Your 3 Truth Cards are being built. Keep this tab open. A few extras go to your inbox.

We could not start that scan. Check your website address and try again, or email us at hello@ontevo.ai and we will run it for you.

Home / Compare / Ontevo vs. Triple Whale

Different layers

One optimizes spend. The other fixes what the spend points to.

Triple Whale is a DTC attribution platform: it unifies ROAS, CAC and ad performance across Meta, Google and TikTok in one dashboard, with a free tier and paid tiers banded by annual GMV (triplewhale.com/pricing, checked 15 September 2026). Its Automate tier adds creative generation and paid-media automations. Ontevo is a product intelligence layer: a 50-point diagnostic reads spec gaps, formulation misses and the claims a comparison shopper looks for on a product page, then prices each one in dollars per month against up to 10 closest competitors in your market. One optimizes distribution. The other fixes what demand meets when it arrives.

Dimension

Ontevo

Triple Whale

Offering and demand

Maps live demand in your market against what you actually sell, and names the gaps.

No product or demand analysis; the input is your own ad and order data.

Reputation

Decomposes what reviews say theme by theme, benchmarked against up to 10 closest competitors in your market.

No review analysis.

Reads rankings, listings and local visibility, and prices what each gap costs.

Channel attribution across paid media; no organic search or listings diagnosis.

Website

Reads the page a buyer lands on and prices what is losing the sale.

Funnel and conversion metrics, plus a landing page builder on the Automate tier; no page-level diagnosis of why a buyer left.

AI visibility

Reads how often AI assistants name you in your category, and what being absent costs.

The free tier reports ChatGPT mentions and citations; no per-assistant competitive picture.

Drafts the fix

13+ Evo Agents draft the fix for your approval.

Creative generation and scheduled paid-media automations on the Automate tier; nothing on the product or the page.

Pricing

$245/mo or $445/mo for one entity. From the fourth entity, a Portfolio plan from $1,500/mo.

A free tier, then pricing banded by annual GMV and quoted; no monthly figure published (triplewhale.com/pricing, checked 15 September 2026).

One entity is $245/mo on Essentials. Three is $735/mo. From the fourth entity you move to a Portfolio plan, from $1,500/mo, and we quote the exact figure on a call.

Read Triple Whale's own page.

How we read this. Every claim in the right-hand column is read from the vendor's own published pages, linked above, and checked on 15 September 2026. Vendors change prices and ship features without notice. Ontevo's figures come from the 50-point diagnostic. If we have a vendor wrong, write to hello@ontevo.ai and we will correct the page.

THE BOTTOM LINE

When to use which

Triple Whale is best in class at post-iOS 14 attribution. If your product is differentiated and the problem is purely channel allocation, it is the right tool, and the free tier means you can find that out without a contract. But if CAC keeps climbing despite creative testing and budget shifts, the bottleneck is likely the product layer: specs, packaging, the claims on the page. Ontevo diagnoses that layer and puts a dollar figure on every gap. Plenty of brands run both.