Per-location revenue leak. Quantified.
Your sponsor wants per-location accountability. You have review software, a PMS, and an agency retainer — and still can't say which of your 23 locations is leaking revenue, or why. Ontevo prices the leak per location, in dollars your sponsor believes, every month. HIPAA-ready from day one.
Prioritized fix lists from 50 analyzers. Dollar-priced, evidence-backed.
A diagnostic engine that gives you a comprehensive performance view of every location — then an agentic layer that drafts every fix and runs the repeatable ones — group-wide.
Location diagnostics
A full commercial teardown of every location — service menu, reputation, local visibility, and AI visibility — benchmarked against 25M+ records and against the rest of your own group.
CapEx validation
Trend-velocity data that validates the $150K laser before you buy it — demand evidence by market and by service line, not a sales rep's pitch deck.
Fixes without headcount
A prioritized fix list per location, with HIPAA-compliant agents drafting review responses, menu updates, and booking flows — no need to hire 23 location marketing managers.
Group rollup
One standardized Truth Card format across every location, so you walk into the sponsor's quarterly review with receipts, not opinions.
Per-location revenue accountability is what your sponsor asks for — and no tool in your stack owns it.
You run a PMS, review software, and an agency retainer. None of them answers the question the sponsor cares about most: which location is leaking, why, and what it costs per month.
Location 7 misses budget
The CFO asks what's different about the underperformer. Review software shows counts; the PMS shows production. Neither shows why demand is going to the competitor across the street.
Reviews diverge across locations
Brand consistency decays with every acquisition. Review themes split location by location — and by the time the sponsor flags it, the damage is priced into the next quarterly review.
CapEx decisions are coin flips
A $150K laser or imaging purchase rides on a hunch about demand. Without trend-velocity data by market, every equipment approval is a bet the sponsor will ask about later.
“Show me — every month — exactly which of my locations is underperforming, what's causing it, what it costs in dollars, and the fix. I need to walk into my sponsor's quarterly review with receipts, not opinions.”
— Sound familiar? This is the brief we built to.
One engine. Every location. One artifact your sponsor already trusts.
Built to fit the acquisition-integration window and the sponsor's quarterly review.
1
2
3
Within-group benchmarking is the differentiator.
A 20-location group is its own cohort. Ontevo benchmarks every location against its siblings — a comparison no outside tool can replicate — with HIPAA-BAA coverage out of the box and a compliance posture that survives IT review.
The per-location report your sponsor wants. Without hiring per-location marketers.
Standardized output
One Truth Card format across every location — you compare all 23 apples-to-apples in a single monthly view.
CFO-peer voice
Dollar-denominated findings in the vocabulary your sponsor uses. Agencies speak in impressions; Ontevo speaks in receipts.
HIPAA-ready today
BAA program in place, PHI handling built in. For most tools this is the disqualifying question; for Ontevo it's the starting point.
Scales with acquisitions
Every location you acquire plugs into the same engine — onboarding takes days, not a marketing-team hire.
An agency retainer per location. Or every location, every month, at a fraction of the line.
A group marketing retainer runs $5K–$25K a month and stops scaling past 10 locations. Ontevo standardizes per-location diagnostics across the whole group and re-runs them every month — with agents drafting the fixes.
Surface a gap worth more than the pilot — or the pilot is on us.
If the Location Leakage Report doesn't surface at least one gap worth more than the pilot fee, you don't pay for the pilot. No fine print. No hoops. We believe in what the agents find.
What group operators ask first
No — it gives you (and the agency) the diagnostic neither of you can produce today. The agency executes campaigns; Ontevo tells you which location needs what, and what it's worth in dollars. Many groups have their agency work directly from the monthly fix list.
They don't have to touch it. The diagnostic runs on public signal — no logins for location staff. Agent-drafted fixes land in one approval queue you control, and nothing publishes without sign-off.
14 days to the first Location Leakage Report on 3 of your locations. The activation milestone is presenting it at your next sponsor quarterly review — typically 60–90 days in.
Yes — BAA program in place, PHI handling built for healthcare, SOC 2 Type 1 in progress, draft-only publishing on all external writes, and tenant isolation. A vendor that can't sign a BAA shouldn't be in your stack.
Within-group benchmarking only means something against the 25M+ record market baseline — and the vertical ontology behind menu and spec analysis is 18+ months of domain work per vertical. The build-vs-buy math favors the cohort owner.
Built by operators from McKinsey product strategy & Yelp local search.
One Truth Card format across all 19 locations — the first sponsor review where I had receipts instead of opinions.
19-location DSO, PE-backed (modeled)
The trend data killed a $150K laser purchase that would have been a mistake — and justified the one we did make.
11-location MedSpa group (modeled)
The rollup surfaced an underperforming location we'd have missed for two more quarters. That's the whole pitch.
Dermatology group · HIPAA-BAA (modeled)
See the leak before your next sponsor review.
Nominate 3 locations. We return a Location Leakage Report with the dollar figure per location and the fix — no long sales cycle, no rip-and-replace. Your next three steps:
1 — Submit 3 location URLs.
2 — We benchmark them against 25M+ records and the rest of your group.
3 — Truth Cards back with the dollar leak and the drafted fix per location.