Find where patient demand is ahead of your services.
Compare public searches, reviews and competing practices to uncover interest in services and barriers to booking. See what each location should investigate, with evidence your clinical and commercial teams can review together.
15-minute call to scope a free Location Leakage Report for three practices using public business data.
Or preview one location free
See what each location should investigate next.
A 50-point diagnostic examines the public evidence behind service demand, reputation, visibility and booking friction. Each recommendation comes with sources to review.
Location diagnostics
A full commercial teardown of every location (service menu, reputation, local visibility, and AI visibility), benchmarked against 25M+ records and against the rest of your own group.
CapEx validation
Compare demand trends, patient feedback and local competitors before adding a service or buying equipment. Bring that evidence into your clinical and financial review.
Fixes without headcount
Give each location a prioritized improvement list, with draft review responses, service descriptions and booking-page changes for your team to check.
Group rollup
One standardized Truth Card format across every location, so you walk into the sponsor's quarterly review with receipts, not opinions.
Find the service demand your locations may be missing.
Look for interest in procedures or care offerings alongside recurring complaints and nearby competitors. Use those findings to frame the commercial question for clinical review.
Location 7 misses budget
The CFO asks what's different about the underperformer. Review software shows counts; the PMS shows production. Neither shows why demand is going to the competitor across the street.
Reviews diverge across locations
Brand consistency decays with every acquisition. Review themes split location by location, and by the time the sponsor flags it, the damage is priced into the next quarterly review.
CapEx decisions are coin flips
Equipment and service decisions need a clear view of local demand. Compare the market evidence with your clinical priorities, costs and capacity before committing.
“Show me, every month, exactly which of my locations is underperforming, what's causing it, what it costs in dollars, and the fix. I need to walk into my sponsor's quarterly review with receipts, not opinions.”
Sound familiar? This is the brief we built to.
Give each practice a specific improvement to work on.
Review the finding, supporting evidence and proposed change in a Truth Card before assigning work to the local team.
1
2
3
Within-group benchmarking is the differentiator.
A 20-location group is its own cohort. Ontevo benchmarks every location against its siblings (a comparison no outside tool can replicate) with draft-only publishing and a security posture that survives IT review.
Connect group priorities to the patient experience.
Compare what people search for, what they say in public reviews and what the practice makes easy to understand or book.
Standardized output
One Truth Card format across every location: you compare all 23 apples-to-apples in a single monthly view.
CFO-peer voice
Dollar-denominated findings in the vocabulary your sponsor uses. Agencies speak in impressions; Ontevo speaks in receipts.
Built for regulated verticals
Outside-in scanning (no PHI required), draft-only publishing on every external write, and a security addendum with a no-training clause.
Scales with acquisitions
Use the same diagnostic across acquired practices so operators can compare findings and agree on local priorities.
Use a consistent diagnostic across the group.
Compare locations through the same five pillars while keeping the evidence tied to their own services and local competition.
From the fourth entity you move to a Portfolio plan, from $1,500/mo, and we quote the exact figure on a call.
Start with a Location Leakage Report for three practices.
The free report compares three locations using public information and arrives in under 24 hours. Discuss paid pilot scope and security requirements with our team before proceeding. Once the required security conditions are met, an agreed paid pilot carries the written guarantee: surface a gap worth more than the pilot, or the pilot is not charged.
What group operators ask first
What a scan reads. Public pages, listings, reviews and competitor pages. No patient records, no client logins, no CRM connection. Nothing you or your client sends us trains a public model. Every external write is draft-only behind your approval queue. SOC 2 Type I and HIPAA readiness are in progress. Details on our Security page.
No. It gives you (and the agency) the diagnostic neither of you can produce today. The agency executes campaigns; Ontevo tells you which location needs what, and what it's worth in dollars. Many groups have their agency work directly from the monthly fix list.
They don't have to touch it. The diagnostic runs on public signal: no logins for location staff. Agent-drafted fixes land in one approval queue you control, and nothing publishes without sign-off.
Under 24 hours to the first Location Leakage Report on 3 of your locations. The activation milestone is presenting it at your next sponsor quarterly review, typically 60 to 90 days in. Use “Discuss a free Location Leakage Report” to agree the scope. The Rapid Scan form above previews one business.
The scan is outside-in. It reads public signals only: no PHI, no logins, no PMS access. Every external write is draft-only behind your approval queue, and we sign a security addendum with a no-training clause. SOC 2 Type I and HIPAA readiness are in progress.
Within-group benchmarking only means something against the 25M+ record market baseline, and the vertical ontology behind menu and spec analysis is 18+ months of domain work per vertical. The build-vs-buy math favors the cohort owner.
See how a team could use the findings.
These illustrative scenarios show how the recommendations could inform a decision.
One Truth Card format across all 19 locations: the first sponsor review where I had receipts instead of opinions.
Illustrative scenario: 19-location DSO, PE-backed
Compare local demand for a new procedure with equipment costs and practice capacity before taking an investment proposal forward.
Illustrative scenario: 11-location MedSpa group
Compare an underperforming practice with nearby competitors and agree which service or booking issue to investigate first.
Illustrative scenario: dermatology group
Company profiles are anonymized composites drawn from real scan patterns.
Choose which practice gaps to investigate first.
Choose three practices for a free Location Leakage Report with findings from public business information; no patient records are needed.
1. Enter one location’s public website and your email.
2. Get three personalized insights from the Rapid Scan.
3. Review the preview and decide what to investigate next.