FOR ATHLEISURE BRANDS

Your Fabric Passes the Squat Test. Your Listing Doesn't Mention It.

48% of legging reviews cite opacity concerns — only 3 in 10 brands claim squat-proof on the PDP. That silence leaks an estimated $47,600/mo. We find every spec gap in one scan.

347 MedSpa businesses trust Ontevo
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
The Problem

Your Fabric Is Better. Your Listing Doesn't Prove It.

Athleisure brands think they have an ad problem. They don't. They have a listing problem. Your PDP says 'buttery soft' while the comparison shopper scans for GSM, opacity, and 4-way stretch.

The Error

This tells you the conversions are already gone — buried specs, static flat-lays, and generic size charts losing the buyer who opens four tabs.

The Market Truth

This tells you how to stop losing them — scannable specs, movement video, and squat-proof claims that close the $80+ sale.

73% of DTC brands say 'buttery soft.' Lululemon trademarked Everlux.

Fit, Funnel, Fix for Athleisure Brands

Three phases. Zero guesswork. One system engineered for activewear brands losing sales to competitors who communicate specs better — not brands who make better fabric.

The Fit (Strategic Intelligence)

Is my product aligned with what buyers compare?

The Spec Lab benchmarks your GSM, opacity, stretch, UPF, and size architecture against the top 20 listings in each sub-category — leggings, sports bras, joggers.

The Funnel (Revenue Intelligence)

Does my listing actually convert the comparison shopper?

The Friction Lab audits every PDP element: spec table scannability, movement video, fit-finder tools, certification badge placement, and cost-per-wear framing.

The Fix (The Action Layer)

Who rewrites 28 SKUs without burning my team?

AI agents draft spec-table rewrites, product concept briefs, and size-fit content. You review every draft. You approve before anything publishes.

YOUR AI TEAM

Your Athleisure Team. Always On. Never Late.

Three specialized agents rewriting specs, generating concepts, and building fit content 24/7. You approve every draft.

Ontevo Approval Queue
3 drafts waiting
Missing squat-proof claim on 12 SKUs
Add explicit opacity rating to legging PDPs
Approve
Skip
No GSM or compression specs listed
Rewrite spec tables with GSM, stretch, pocket dims
Approve
Skip
Size-inconsistency returns at 38%
Deploy fit-finder content with exact measurements
Approve
Skip
CASE STUDY

How Kinetic Theory Fixed the Fabric Fatigue Gap

BEFORE ONTEVO
Chair Utilization
38%
Service Menu
Generic descriptors, no GSM, no opacity claims
Key Insight Missed
'Squat-proof' cited in 48% of 1-3 star reviews. Not on their PDPs. $47,600/mo leaking from spec gaps alone.
AFTER ONTEVO
Chair Utilization
22%
The Fix Applied
Spec-table rewrites + fit-finder content deployed
Revenue Impact
+$29K /month
Based on analysis of 450 local search terms.

48%

Avg. invisible demand

28

Items scanned

+$47.6K

Avg. monthly revenue lift

3

AI agents

STOP GUESSING. START ENGINEERING.

The World’s First Fractional Growth team.

See the exact revenue you lost to competitors yesterday. Analysis takes 60 seconds.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.