For Consumer Products Companies · Retail & Distribution Channels

Your line wins the spec sheet and loses the product page.

You fought for the placement. Then a shelf competitor's PDP claims a spec your product has shipped for two years, review themes drift retailer by retailer, and the AI assistants answering "best [CATEGORY]" name other brands. Ontevo benchmarks every product line against roughly 10 direct competitors and 25M+ market records, prices each gap in dollars, and drafts the fix.

Free Rapid Scan · your top 3 leaks in 60 seconds · no credit card
Scan running. Your top 3 Truth Cards will be on screen in about 60 seconds. A few extras go to your inbox.
Something went wrong. Check your URL and try again.
Ontevo — one diagnostic engine replaces the marketing stack
Diagnostic engine

The claim matrix, the dollar figure, and the drafted fix, per line.

A diagnostic engine that gives you a per-line performance view across the portfolio, then an agentic layer that drafts the PDP spec blocks, claim copy, and review responses for your team's approval.

Ontevo Truth Card

Rank the portfolio

A dollar-priced Truth Card stack per line, so the category review starts with which line leaks most, backed with receipts.

Arm the line review

Walk in with the claim matrix and the dollar figure instead of a hunch about why share slipped.

Prioritize R&D and packaging

When the leak is a claim you can already make, the fix is copy. When it's a spec you lack, the card prices the case for the roadmap.

Watch the category shift

Benchmarks refresh against the same ~10 rivals, so a new claim on a competitor PDP surfaces as a new card, priced.

The sell-through gap

Distribution won you the shelf. The digital shelf is where the line leaks.

A division GM sees POS totals and share reports. Nobody on the team can say which spec claim, review theme, or search miss is draining a specific line, or what it costs per month.

Syndicated data reports the damage weeks late

Circana and NIQ tell you share moved. The competitor claim that moved it, the one now spreading across the line's ~10 shelf rivals' PDPs, never appears in the report.

Retailer scorecards grade your pages in isolation

Vendor portals flag your missing images and short titles. The rival spec block converting your shoppers two tiles over sits outside the portal entirely.

Review themes drift by retailer, and nobody reads them per line

An installation complaint clusters at one retailer, a packaging complaint at another. Each one predicts returns and lost reorders, and each one dies unread in a feed.

AI assistants now answer the category question

When a shopper asks an assistant for the best dimmer for a smart home, the answer names a short list of brands and cites its reasons. Whether your line makes that list is a question nobody in the division currently owns.

The core problem

“Tell me which line is leaking, which claim or theme is causing it, and what it costs per month. Give me evidence I can put in front of the category review, and a drafted fix my team can approve. And do it without a six-month engagement.”

- The buyer's actual ask. No portal or panel answers it.

HOW IT WORKS

One engine for every line in the portfolio.

Diagnose the line, price the gap, draft the fix: one format across the whole portfolio.

1

Days 1-7
Diagnose the line
50 analyzers benchmark each product line across Market Fit, Reputation, Visibility, Conversion, and AI Visibility against 25M+ records and roughly 10 direct competitors, down to the spec claim on a rival PDP and the review theme clustering at one retailer.

2

Every line
Price the gap
Every finding renders in operator vocabulary (Revenue Leakage, PDP Conversion, Review Themes, Search Demand) with a confidence score and a dollar figure. One format across the whole portfolio, so lines compare cleanly at the category review.

3

Ongoing
Draft the fix
12 drafting agents draft PDP spec blocks, claim copy, review responses, and prioritized fix lists. Someone on your team approves before anything ships. Automation of the repeatable work is the Intelligence tier, quoted per portfolio.
The Differentiator

Built for the division that owns a P&L

The view syndicated data and retailer portals can't produce: each line benchmarked against its own ~10 shelf rivals, priced in dollars.

Why it wins here

Built for the division that owns a P&L, sold through channels it can't see into.

Per-line Truth Cards

Each line benchmarked against its own ~10 shelf rivals, priced in dollars: the view syndicated data and retailer portals can't produce.

Outside-in by design

Public signals only: retailer PDPs, reviews, search demand, AI assistant answers. Zero integration with your ERP, PIM, or retailer systems.

Agents draft, your team approves

12 drafting agents write the PDP fixes, claim copy, and review responses a channel-marketing team would otherwise queue for a quarter.

Priced per line, month to month

$245 to $445 per line per month, self-serve. A consulting engagement asks for six months before the first finding.

vs. your current stack

It answers the question your portals can't.

Syndicated data reports share. Retailer portals grade your own pages. Review feeds collect. None of them names the claim, theme, or search miss draining a specific line, or what it costs per month.

Your current stack
What it does
With Ontevo
Syndicated data (Circana, NIQ)
Reports share moved, weeks late
The claim that moved it, priced per line
Retailer portals & scorecards
Grade your own PDPs in isolation
The rival spec block two tiles over, benchmarked
Review feeds
Collect reviews
Themes clustered per retailer and per line, priced
AI assistants
Answer the category question without you
Whether your line makes the list, and the evidence cited
Your portals: the damage, reported late
Ontevo: the leak diagnosed + the fix drafted
ESSENTIALS
$245/mo
One product line = one entity
Full diagnostic engine: 50 analyzers
All 5 pillars, including AI Visibility
Truth Cards with dollar figures and confidence scores
Benchmarked against ~10 direct competitors and 25M+ records
Month-to-month
GROWTH
$445/mo
Everything in Essentials
12 drafting agents
PDP spec blocks and claim copy, drafted
Review responses, drafted
Prioritized fix lists
Simulation Engine (beta)
Concept Studio (beta)
Your team approves before anything ships
PORTFOLIO
from $1.5K/mo
Multi-brand and multi-line portfolios
One master agreement, one commercial relationship
Per-line Truth Cards across the portfolio
Lines ranked by revenue leak
5+ lines, brands, or locations
Sales-assisted onboarding
Priority support
Add Intelligence: automation of the repeatable work, by quote
Our Promise

Find wasted money in 30 days, or month two is free.

If we don't surface at least one gap worth more than your monthly plan, the next month costs nothing. No fine print. No hoops. We believe in what our agents find, and if they don't find value, you don't pay.

What division leaders ask first

Do we have to integrate our retailer portals, PIM, or syndicated data?

No. The scan is outside-in and reads public signals: retailer PDPs, reviews, search demand, and AI assistant answers. Your first Truth Cards arrive with nothing connected.

What does Ontevo access, and what is your security posture?

Public signals only. No connection into your ERP, PIM, or retailer systems, and no customer PII. SOC 2 Type I is in progress; we will describe ourselves as certified on the day the report exists and no sooner.

What counts as an entity?

One product line (or one brand inside the portfolio) is one entity, at $245 or $445 per month. Portfolios run under a master agreement from $1.5K/mo.

Most of our volume moves through distribution and the pro channel. Does this still apply?

Yes. End users and specifiers research on the public digital shelf even when the transaction happens through a distributor, so the PDP claims, review themes, and AI answers still decide sell-through. The benchmark reads the same surfaces your channel customers do.

What's the commitment?

Month-to-month, per line. Free entry is the 60-second Rapid Scan and the Spec Gap Report on 3 hero SKUs; paid plans start when you add a line.

The buyer we built this for

Built by operators from McKinsey product strategy & Yelp local search.

Our line won the spec sheet and lost the product page. A rival's PDP claimed a feature we'd shipped for two years, and nobody owned the question.

Division GM

Wiring devices · big-box + electrical distribution

The claim matrix walked into the category review and did the arguing for us. The next dollar went to R&D, not trade spend.

VP Brand

Small appliances · multi-brand house

4 of 5 competitors claimed Metal Utensil Safe. We shipped it and never said it. That was the whole leak.

Category Lead

Cookware · Target, Amazon 1P, specialty retail

See the spec gap before the next category review.

Nominate 3 hero SKUs from one product line. We return Truth Cards with the claim matrix against the line's shelf competitors, the dollar figures, and the drafted fixes. Free, no credit card, and nothing in your systems to connect.

1. Submit 3 retailer PDP URLs for your hero SKUs.

2. We benchmark them against 25M+ records and the line's ~10 direct competitors.

3. Truth Cards back with the dollar leak and the drafted fix.

STOP GUESSING. START ENGINEERING.

Stop Guessing What to Sell. Start Building What They Want.